![]() ![]() He took a pair of piles a foot and a half thick, slightly pointed at the lower ends and of a length adapted to the varying depth of the river, and fastened them together two feet apart. “The method he adopted in building the bridge was as follows. Moreover, when it began to blow hard and they were running before the wind, they weathered the storm more easily they could bring in to shallow water with greater safety, and when left aground by the tide had nothing to fear from reefs or pointed rocks – whereas to our ships all these risks were formidable.” We could not injure them by ramming because they were so solidly built, and their height made it difficult to reach them with missiles or board them with grappling-irons. In meeting them the only advantage our ships possessed was that they were faster and could be propelled by oars in other respects the enemy’s were much better adapted for sailing such treacherous and stormy waters. They used sails made of raw hides or thin leather, either because they had no flax and were ignorant of its use, or more probably because they thought that ordinary sails would not stand the violent storms and squalls of the Atlantic and were not suitable for such heavy vessels. The anchors were secured with iron chains instead of ropes. The cross-timbers, which consisted of beams a foot wide, were fastened with iron bolts as thick as a man’s thumb. Exceptionally high bows and sterns fitted them for use in heavy seas and violent gales, and the hulls were made entirely of oak, to enable them to stand any amount of shocks and rough usage. ![]() They were made with much flatter bottoms, to help them to ride shallow water caused by shoals or ebb-tides. “The Gauls’ own ships were built and rigged in a different manner from ours. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |